Dismissed
Abakasha Jena v. State
Orissa HCOJC/1629/2002
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the efflux of time.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
OJC No. 1629 of 2002
¶2
06. 22.08.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time, this
writ petition has become infructuous. A memo has also been filed with the same prayer.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
¶3
........
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶4
....
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
¶5
dm
¶6
-2-
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court