Dismissed
Artatrana v. Executive Officer
Orissa HCOJC/10201/1997
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 1997 02.08.2016 None appears on behalf of…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OJC NO. 10201 of 1997
02.08.2016
None appears on behalf of the petitioners at the time of call.
Mr. D. Mohapatra, learned counsel for opposite party is present.
The petitioner- files this application seeking for a direction to opposite parties to pa
y the differential salary, gratuity and pension as due and admissible to him in accordance wit
h law.
Since none is there to prosecute the matter, the writ application stands dismissed for n
on-prosecution.
Petitioner
Opposite Party
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court