Petition dismissed as infructuous since the underlying Revisional First Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution on 09.11.2016. No substantial legal proposition of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.11.2016
C.M.P. No.1462 of 2016
Challenge is made to the order dated 22.08.2016 passed by the learned District
Judge, Balasore in R.F.A. No. 95 of 2003-I.
None appears for the petitioner.
Mr. S.K. Bal, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 8 to 15 submits that
the R.F.A. No. 95 of 2003-I has been dismissed for non-prosecution on 09.11.2016. Thus, the p
etition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
2
Petitioner
Opposite Party Nos. 8 to 15
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court