Allowed

Sridhar Mandal v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC12 Jan 2016ABLAPL/18439/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to petitioners facing arrest in a criminal case alleged to involve offences under sections 341, 323, 325, 354, 427, and 506/34 of the IPC. The bail is subject to conditions to be framed by the arresting officer.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner to be released on bail if arrested on terms to be fixed by the arresting officer.

Sridhar Mandal Vs State of Orissa — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2016)

¶1

ABLAPL No.18439 of 2015
 12.01.2016
 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate.
 The petitioners are apprehending arrest for the alleged commission of offence
under Sections 341, 323, 325, 354, 427 and 506/34 of the IPC in C.T. Case No.2393 of 2015 of t
he court of learned S.D.J.M., Balasore, arising out of Remuna P.S. Case No.178 of 2015.
 Keeping in view the nature of allegations and the facts of the case, applicati
on for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest of the petitioners in the aforesai
d case, they shall be released on bail by the arresting officer on such terms and conditions a
s deemed just and proper by him.
 The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly.
 Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

¶2

Sridhar Mandal v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sridhar Mandal v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Dillip Ku.Debata Vs State of Orissa

Saura@Surendra Mallick Vs State of Orissa

Subhakanta Aich Vs State of Orissa

Narahari Jena Vs State of Orissa

Laxmidhar Jena Vs State of Orissa

Kailash Jena@Hada@Hada Jena Vs State of Orissa