P.Kannan v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
HR&CE temple tenancy and threatened eviction dispute, Kuttalam/Mayiladuthurai; writ of mandamus under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking consideration of tenant's representation dated 06.12.2025 and recognition as lawful tenant to continue business in S.No.176/2; arrears of rent Rs.13,22,685/- with payments of Rs.3,17,000/- (09.12.2025) and Rs.3,60,156/-; temple took possession of property except bakery portion; tenancy regularisation left open to authorities on merits in accordance with law; second respondent (Joint Commissioner, Sitharkadu, Mayiladuthurai) to decide within four weeks after hearing petitioner; writ petition disposed of, no costs.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2025, hear the petitioner, and dispose of it in the manner known to law within four weeks of receipt of the web copy of the order without waiting for the certified copy; the petitioner's continued possession of the bakery portion recorded; the wider tenancy issue left open to the authorities on merits; connected miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs.