Allowed

Deepak v. the Director of School Education

Madras HC19 Dec 2025WP/49485/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought correction of his name in SSLC, 11th, and 12th mark sheets following a name change by Gazette Notification. The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to correct the records within eight weeks, following precedent.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to correct petitioner's name in 10th, 11th, and 12th standard mark sheets and school records within eight weeks.

Deepak Vs the Director of School Education — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.49485 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 19.12.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

W.P.No.49485 of 2025

Deepak

... Petitioner

The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.

¶11

The District Educational Officer, South Zone, Dr.Ambedkar Government Higher Secondary School Campus, Ground Floor, Behind Gandhi Irwin Bridge, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶12

The Principal, Santhome Higher Secondary School, Mylapore,

¶13

Chennai – 600 004.

¶14

The Directorate of Government Examinations, State Board of School Examination, Department of Government Examinations, Chennai – 600 006. ... Respondents [R4 suo motu impleaded as per the order of this Court made in W.P.No.49485 of 2025 dated 19.12.2025 by DBCJ]

¶15

1/6

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.49485 of 2025

¶18

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 04.11.2025 and effect necessary corrections in the petitioner’s SSLC, 11^th and 12^th Marksheet and School records changing his name from Stephene Raj to Deepak, in accordance with the Gazette Notification dated 23.05.2023, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kesavan For Respondents : Ms.P.Rajarajeswari Government Advocate for R1, R2 & R4

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to consider the

¶22

representation of the petitioner dated 04.01.2025 and effect corrections in his 10^th , 11^th and 12th mark sheets and school record by changing the name from Stephene Raj to Deepak in accordance with the Gazette notification dated 23.05.2023.

¶23

The case of the writ petitioner is that his original name was ‘Stephene Raj’ and accordingly, the same was reflected in his Secondary School Leaving Certificate, 11^th Standard-Higher Secondary School Course Certificate and 12^th Standard-Higher Secondary Course Certificate. However, thereafter by following the due process of law, the petitioner has changed his name as ‘Deepak’. The Aadhar card and the other documents are also changed. The Gazette Publication is also produced before this Court. By enclosing all the above, the petitioner made a representation on 04.11.2025 to alter his name in the School records.

¶24

2/6

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.No.49485 of 2025

¶27

¶28

Ms.P.Rajarajeswari, learned Government Advocate appearing on

¶29

behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that as per Rule 5 of the Secondary School Leaving Certificate Rules, the corrections can be made only until the time the petitioner is undergoing the course. Even if the petitioner has changed the name as per the Gazette, the same need not be carried out in the school records.

¶30

I have considered the rival submissions made on either side and

¶31

perused the material records of the case.

¶32

In identical circumstances, this Court in S.Guru Prasad Vs. The Directorate of Government Examinations and ors. [W.P.(MD)No.761 of 2020] speaking through Hon’ble Ms. Justice P.T Asha had considered the relevant judgments and allowed the writ petition directing the School Education Authorities to correct the name. In view thereof, since the petitioner is not getting any undue benefit on account of the change, it is only a name change, though it is an additional burden on the respondents, considering the prejudice that is pleaded, the writ petition can be ordered. Charges, if any, shall be collected from the petitioner.

¶33

3/6

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.No.49485 of 2025 6. In view thereof, this Writ Petition is allowed on the following

¶36

terms:

¶37

(i) The 4^th respondent is directed to correct the name of the petitioner as ‘Deepak’ in the place of ‘Stephene Raj’ in his 10^th , 11^th and 12^th standard mark sheets and school records either by making an endorsement in the existing mark sheets or by issuing a fresh mark sheet;

¶38

(ii) The said exercise is directed to be completed within a period of

¶39

eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of web copy of the order without waiting for the certified copy.

(iii) No costs.

19.12.2025

veda

Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶44

4/6

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P.No.49485 of 2025

¶47

¶48

The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.

¶49

The District Educational Officer, South Zone, Dr.Ambedkar Government Higher Secondary School Campus, Ground Floor, Behind Gandhi Irwin Bridge, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶50

The Directorate of Government Examinations, State Board of School Examination, Department of Government Examinations, Chennai – 600 006.

¶51

5/6

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

W.P.No.49485 of 2025

¶54

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

veda

W.P.No.49485 of 2025

19.12.2025 (2/2)

6/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Deepak v. the Director of School Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak v. the Director of School Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sundaram Anantha Padmanaban Vs T.Soundirajan

Fida Fathima a Vs National Testing Agency (Ntc)

D.Srilatha Vs 1.THE Secy., the Railway Emplo

Mr. M. Sridhararamanujadhasan @ Sridharan Vs the Commissioner

Aalim Muhammed Salegh College of Engineering Vs Anna University

Kingston Engineering College Vs Anna University