K.Rathinasamy v. D.Nirmala Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
W.M.P.No.1203 of 2022 in W.P.No.24785 of 2021; High Court of Judicature at Madras; Justice Krishnan Ramasamy; order dated 08-07-2026; impleadment of proposed Respondents 5 & 6 (K.Rathinasamy and K.Chidambaram); Article 226 of the Constitution of India; Writ Miscellaneous Petition allowed as prayed for; Registry directed to amend cause title; Tiruppur/Palladam revenue matter; counsel K.R.Nishanth, R.Priyanka, B.Pachaiyappan (Government Counsel).
What did the court decide?
The Writ Miscellaneous Petition was allowed as prayed for; K.Rathinasamy and K.Chidambaram stand impleaded as Respondents 5 & 6 in W.P.No.24785 of 2021, and the Registry was directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title of that Writ Petition. ¶¶39