Muniraj v. The District Collector and Arbitrator
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: writ of mandamus; disposal of pending appeal dated 08.06.2026; Section 3G (5) National Highways Act, 1956; Section 29(1) and (2) RFCTLARR Act, 2013; Sections 26 to 30 RFCTLARR Act 2013 (Central Act 30 of 2013); Sections 18 to 27 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; Article 226 Constitution of India; compensation enhancement; revaluation of structure-building, borewell, basement, trees, amenities; Awards Na.Ka.No.583/2026/A3 and Na.Ka.No.558/2026/A3; Sy.No.188/4 and 188/5A, Jittandahalli Village, Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri; Krishnagiri; suo motu impleadment; eight-week timeline; no costs; miscellaneous petition closed. Holding: procedural direction only — first respondent to decide the compensation-enhancement appeal on merits within 8 weeks; no view expressed on merits or quantum.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the first respondent (District Collector and Arbitrator) to dispose of the petitioner's appeal dated 08.06.2026, after due notice to the petitioner, aggrieved parties and the suo motu impleaded second respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within eight weeks of receipt of the order; writ petition disposed of without costs and the connected miscellaneous petition (WMP No. 28306 of 2026) closed. Registry directed to amend the cause title (para 44).