Disposed¶26

Rajesh v. Union Of India

Madras HC8 Sept 2025WP(MD)/24227/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (B.Pugalandhi, J.), WP.(MD)No.24227 of 2025, decided 08.09.2025: mandamus sought for early renewal of passport valid till 09.05.2026 for Dubai employment; Court declined premature renewal citing governing Rules and directed that renewal be considered positively on 10.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

No mandamus issued; writ petition disposed of with no direction for premature renewal, but with the observation that renewal be considered positively on 10.05.2026 as per Rules. No costs. ¶26

Rajesh Vs Union Of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP.(MD)No.24227 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 08.09.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

WP.(MD)No.24227 of 2025

Rajesh

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.Union of India Rep by the Principal Secretary to Government, Ministry of External Affairs, Shasthri Bhavan, New Delhi.

¶11

2.The Regional Passport Officer, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai 625 002.

¶12

3.The Inspector of Police, Keelavalavu Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first and second respondents to renewal the petitioner’s passport No.P0360181 in ARN No.252003796226 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Santhanam Rajesh Kumar For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Poornachandran, Standing Counsel. For R3 : Mr.S.Prakash, Government Advocate(Crl.side)

¶16

1/4

¶17

WP.(MD)No.24227 of 2025

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The petitioner seeking renewal of his passport has submitted an application and has also filed this petition seeking a direction to the respondents 1 & 2 to renew his passport.

¶20

2.The petitioner has already been issued with passport in passport No.P0360181 in ARN No.252003796226. The said passport is valid upto 09.05.2026. However, the petitioner obtained a job in Dubai in the month of June 2025 and one of the condition of the employer is that the persons who are having passport for a minimum period of two years would be considered for working visa. Therefore, the petitioner has filed an application before the second respondent to renew his passport.

¶21

3.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 submits that the renewal of passport of this petitioner can be considered only after the expiry of the current passport, ie., on 10.05.2026.

¶22

4.This Court has considered the submissions made on either side and perused the available records.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/4

¶25

WP.(MD)No.24227 of 2025

¶26

5.Since there are certain Rules to renew the passport, this Court is not inclined to issue any direction to the second respondent to renew the petitioner’s passport, which is still having validity upto 09.05.2026. However, the renewal of passport of this petitioner can be considered positively on 10.05.2026, as per Rules. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶27

08.09.2025

¶28

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes gns

¶29

¶30

1.Union of India

¶31

Rep by the Principal Secretary to Government, Ministry of External Affairs, Shasthri Bhavan, New Delhi.

¶32

2.The Regional Passport Officer, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai 625 002.

¶33