Dismissed

M.Raghuram v. The Commissioner

Madras HC5 Nov 2024WP/6786/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus to foreclose a license issued through public auction and refund the deposit amount. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which was granted; consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn and related proceedings closed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted permission to withdraw the writ petition; writ dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

M.Raghuram Vs The Commissioner — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.6786 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 05.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

W.P No.6786 of 2020

and

WMP.No.8081 of 2020

M.Raghuram ...Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The Commissioner,

¶12

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Nungambakkam High Road,

¶13

Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.

¶14

The Fit Person,

¶15

A/m. Patteeswaraswamy Temple,

¶16

Perur, Coimbatore.

¶17

The Assistant Commissioner / Executive Officer,

¶18

A/m. Pateeswaran Swamy Temple,

¶19

Perur, Coimbatore.

¶20

R. Hari Haran,

¶21

Assistant Commissioner / Executive Officer,

¶22

A/m. Pateeswaraswamy Temple, Perur, Coimbatore. ...Respondents

¶23

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for

¶24

issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to foreclose the

¶25

1/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶27

W.P.No.6786 of 2020

¶28

licence issued to the petitioner vide Public Auction held on 22.07.2019 and

¶29

refund the deposit amount / license premium of Rs.18,62,600/- to the petitioner.

¶30

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Srikanth For Respondents : Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader HR & CE

¶31

O R D E R

¶32

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to

¶33

withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶34

In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned

¶35

counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶36

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶37

05.11.2024

¶38

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

2/4

W.P.No.6786 of 2020

The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.

¶45

The Fit Person, A/m. Patteeswaraswamy Temple, Perur, Coimbatore.

¶46

The Assistant Commissioner / Executive Officer, A/m. Pateeswaran Swamy Temple, Perur, Coimbatore.

¶47

R. Hari Haran, Assistant Commissioner / Executive Officer, A/m. Pateeswaraswamy Temple, Perur, Coimbatore.

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

W.P.No.6786 of 2020

S. SOUNTHAR, J.

W.P No.6786 of 2020

05.11.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

M.Raghuram v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Raghuram v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.B.Mahalakshmi Vs The Director

V.Balakrishnan Vs The Exeuctive Officer

Vadivel Murugan, Vs The Joint Commissioner

D.Jerina Vs Director of Matriculation Schools

G.M.Balachandran Vs The District Collector.

C.Saraswathi Vs The Commissioner