K.Kasammal v. J.Rakkammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appellant failed to appear in person for hearing. The court dismissed the second appeal by default for non-compliance with procedural rules regarding presence of parties.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed for default with no costs.
What the court decided
SA.(MD)No.670 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 29.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
SA.(MD)No.670 of 2005 K.Kasammal ... Appellant Vs. J.Rakkammal ... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Cr.P.C., against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.137 of 2003 dated 06.12.2004 on the file of the III Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.143 of 2002 dated 03.01.2003 on the file of the District Munsif, Madurai.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.N.Nagarajan for M/s.Veera Associates
JUDGMENT
This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.137 of 2003 dated 06.12.2004 on the file of the III Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.143 of 2002 dated 03.01.2003 on the file of the District Munsif, Madurai.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Kasammal
- respondent
J.Rakkammal
Coram
V.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court