Arumugam v. Veeri
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal is dismissed as abated as the sole respondent had died six years ago prior to the hearing and no steps were taken within the statutory period of limitation.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
SA.(MD)No.717 of 2006
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 27.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
SA.(MD)No.717 of 2006 Arumugam ... Appellant Vs. Veeri ... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Cr.P.C., against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.216 of 2001 dated 01.03.2004 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Aruppukottai, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.246 of 1994 dated 21.02.2001 on the file of the District Munsif, Aruppukottai.
For Appellant : Mrs.Vijayakumari Natarajan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Parthasarathy
JUDGMENT
This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree
passed in A.S.No.216 of 2001 dated 01.03.2004 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Aruppukottai, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.246 of 1994 dated 21.02.2001 on the file of the District Munsif, Aruppukottai.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arumugam
- respondent
Veeri
Coram
V.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court