P.Krishnan v. P.Ramesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed as abated because the sole appellant died and no steps were taken to substitute legal representatives within the limitation period.
What the court decided
SA.(MD)No.662 of 2006
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 29.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
SA.(MD)No.662 of 2006
P.Krishnan ... Appellant
Vs.
1.P.Ramesh 2.Jayaraman 3.A.Geetha 4.Subramanian 5.Thirunavukkarasu 6.Kaliamurthy ... Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Cr.P.C., against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.14 of 2005 dated 28.09.2005 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thanjavur, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.118 of 1999 dated 15.04.2004 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur.
For Appellant : Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan For Respondents : Mr.G.Kannan for R1
1/4
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.Krishnan
- respondent
P.Ramesh
- respondent
Jayaraman
- respondent
A.Geetha
- respondent
Subramanian
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court