Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a property suit was listed for hearing; counsel reported the sole appellant died in 2021 and no steps were taken to bring legal representatives on record within limitation. The High Court dismissed the appeal as abated and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SA.(MD)No.552 of 2006
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 27.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
SA.(MD)No.552 of 2006 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2006
Ponnan
... Appellant Vs.
1.Krishnammal 2.Vaiyapuri 3.Perumal 4.Mariyaee 5.Mookkan ... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Cr.P.C., against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.29 of 2005 dated 09.08.2005 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.123 of 1999 dated 27.07.2004 on the file of the District Munsif, Kulithalai.
For Appellant : Mr.Anand Chandrasekar For Respondents : Mr.G.Sridharan for Mr.T.M.Hariharan for R1,2,4 &5
1/4
SA.(MD)No.552 of 2006
JUDGMENT
This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.29 of 2005 dated 09.08.2005 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.123 of 1999 dated 27.07.2004 on the file of the District Munsif, Kulithalai.
27.11.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No LS
2/4
SA.(MD)No.552 of 2006
To
3/4
SA.(MD)No.552 of 2006
V.SIVAGNANAM,J.
LS
SA.(MD)No.552 of 2006
27.11.2024
Ponnan
Krishnammal
Vaiyapuri
Perumal
Mariyaee
Mookkan
V.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
