Condonation of delay was already granted; this consequential petition to set aside the dismissal of the second appeal was not opposed and was ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP. No.5593 of 2024 in
S.A. No.616 of 2017
P.B.BALAJI, J.,
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to set aside the order of dismissal dated 13.10.2023 passed in S.A.No.617 of 2017. The condonation delay petition has already been ordered by me dated 04.03.2024. This application is consequent application and the affidavit is filed on the same set of facts and reasons, already been accepted in the condone delay application.
2. Mr.M.Sriram, learned counsel for the 1st respondent has no serious
objection for allowing this application. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are ordered.
3. Post the matter for argument on 18.03.2024.
13.03.2024
bsm
P.B.BALAJI, J.,
bsm
C.M.P. No.5593 of 2024 in S.A. No.616 of 2017
13.03.2024
1st Respondent
P.B.Balaji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
