C.Natarajan v. Jecintha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed Second Appeals filed under Section 100 CPC as withdrawn by the Appellant, who sought permission to withdraw via counsel on the same day. Connected miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed without costs.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeals and connected miscellaneous petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
S.A. Nos.147 & 163 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
S.A. Nos.147 & 163 of 2019 and CMP. Nos.2748 & 3027 of 2019
C.Natarajan
...Appellant in both S.As
Vs.
Jecintha
...Respondent in both S.As
COMMON PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge at Coonoor, Nilgiri District in A.S. Nos.6 & 7 of 2008 dated 10.12.2018 confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Munsiff at Kothagiri in O.S. Nos.21 of 2014 & 35 of 2015 dated 09.06.2017 and consequently dismiss the suit thereby allowing the above Second Appeal.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeals filed under Section 100 CPC should be allowed or dismissed.
Whether the Appellant's request to withdraw the Second Appeals can be accepted.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
C.Natarajan
- respondent
Jecintha
Coram
P.B.BALAJI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court