Appellants in a second appeal under Section 100 CPC withdrew the appeal after disposing of the suit property. The Court recorded the endorsement and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.636 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
S.A.No.636 of 2020 and
CMP. No.13280 of 2020
M.Vadivelu (died)
...Appellants
Vs.
1.T.Subramanian 2.S.Deivamani
...Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the Judgment and Decree in A.S. No.27 of 2016 passed by the Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai dated 18.12.2019 reversing the Judgment and Decree in respect of permanent injunction granted in O.S. No.16 of 2014 passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge at Tiruvannamalai dated 07.06.2016 and allow this Second Appeal.
For Appellants :Ms.Suseela Devi
For Respondents : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan
1/2
S.A.No.636 of 2020
JUDGMENT
P.B.BALAJI, J,
The learned counsel for the Appellants states that the appellants
have disposed of the suit property and hence nothing survives for consideration in the Second Appeal and she seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Second Appeal and she has also made an endorsement to that effect.
12.03.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No rkp To
1.The Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Principal Subordinate Judge at Tiruvannamalai.
S.A.No.636 of 2020 and CMP. No.13280 of 2020
2/2
M.Vadivelu (died)
T.Subramanian
S.Deivamani
P.B.BALAJI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
