Dismissed

Saraswathi v. Ponnathal

Madras HC14 Mar 2024SA/403/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed Second Appeals and connected miscellaneous petitions as not pressed. The appellants filed a memo stating that their legal representatives had settled the matter with the respondents and they did not intend to pursue the appeals further.

What did the court decide?

Second Appeals and connected Miscellaneous Petitions were dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Saraswathi Vs Ponnathal — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

S.A. Nos.403 & 404 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 14.03.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI

¶6

S.A. Nos.403 & 404 of 2018 and

¶7

CMP. Nos.11179 & 11182 of 2018 and

¶8

CMP. Nos.22997 & 22996 of 2022

¶9

1.Saraswathi 2.Rathinambal

¶10

...Appellants in both S.As

Vs.

1.Ponnathal

2.Shanmugasundaram

3.Umadevi

...Respondents 1 to 3 in both S.As

¶16

4.The State of Tamil Nadu represented by The District Collector, Erode District.

¶17

5.The Tasildhar, Perundurai.

¶18

...Respondents 4 & 5 in S.A. No.404 of 2018

¶19

1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

S.A. Nos.403 & 404 of 2018

¶22

COMMON PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and decree in A.S. Nos.111 & 112 of 2017 dated 27.04.2018 on the file of the 2^nd Additional District Judge, Erode in confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S. Nos.142 of 2011 & 46 of 2013 dated 28.02.2017 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Perundurai.

¶23

For Appellant : Mrs.V.Srimathi in both S.As For Respondent : Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan in both S.As

¶24

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶25

Though Civil Miscellaneous Petitions in CMP. Nos.22997 &

¶26

22996 of 2022 are listed for bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased first appellant, the learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo stating that the legal heirs of the first appellant have already settled the matter with the contesting respondents and the appellants do not intend to pursue these Second Appeals. In this regard, a memo dated 14.03.2024, is placed before this Court for not pressing the Second Appeal.

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

S.A. Nos.403 & 404 of 2018

¶30

Recording the said memo dated 14.03.2024 and the

¶31

representation of the learned counsel for the appellants, these Second Appeals are dismissed as not pressed. Consequently, connected

¶32

Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed. No costs.

¶33

14.03.2024

¶34

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No rkp To

¶35

1.The Additional District Judge, Erode. 2.The Subordinate Judge, Perundurai.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

S.A. Nos.403 & 404 of 2018

¶39

P.B.BALAJI, J,

¶40

rkp

¶41

S.A. Nos.403 & 404 of 2018 and CMP. Nos.11179 & 11182 of 2018 and CMP. Nos.22997 & 22996 of 2022

¶42

14.03.2024

¶43

4/4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Saraswathi v. Ponnathal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saraswathi v. Ponnathal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Venkatesan Vs Natesa Gounder (dead) 1. Visalakshmi

D.Subramanian Vs Swaminthan (Died)

S.P. Purushothaman Vs Lakshmi

C.Natarajan Vs Jecintha

Rajini Vs Annamalai

Mani Vs Padmavathy