Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

M.K. Tharangaraman Vs Suseela — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

Home
Madras HC
2024
M.K. Tharangaraman Vs SuseelaM.K. Tharangaraman v. Suseela

Dismissed

M.K. Tharangaraman v. Suseela

Madras HC10 Apr 2024AS/94/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An appeal suit against a trial court judgment and decree was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant's counsel was not ready to argue.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

A.S.NO.94 OF 2018

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.04.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL

A.S.NO.94 OF 2018

AND

CMP NO.2440 OF 2018

M.K.Tharagaraman

... Appellant / Plaintiff

Vs.

1.Suseela

2.Devaki

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
M.K.Tharagaraman
respondent
Suseela
respondent
Devaki
respondent
Giri
respondent
Venu
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 10 Apr 2024 · April
Registered: 5 Feb 2018
Case no.: AS/94/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R. Subramanian R.sakthivel

Valliammal Vs Govindammal
8 Apr 2024
Thailambal@Thailammai Vs Dhanalakshmi
8 Apr 2024
Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs D.Senthil Kumar
8 Apr 2024
Pavayammal Vs Karpagavalli
10 Apr 2024

Cite this judgement

M.K. Tharangaraman v. Suseela, AS/94/2018 (MAD), decided on 10 April 2024.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R.Subramanian and R.Sakthivel

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The appeal suit was dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel for the appellant was not ready; the connected civil miscellaneous petition was also closed. The order decides nothing of general application.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

3.Giri

4.Venu

5.Ramani

6.Sujatha

7.Hemavathi @ Hemalatha

8.Kannaiya Naidu

9.The Joint Sub Registrar II Arakkonam,

Vellore District.

10.The Inspector General of Registration 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028.

1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.S.NO.94 OF 2018

11.The Taluk Surveyor Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore District.

12.The Village Administrative Officer Kilkuppam Village & Post, Arakkonam Taluk.

13.The Tahsildar Arakkonam, Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore District.

14.The District Collector Vellore District, Sathuvachari, Vellore – 632 009. ... Respondents / Defendants 1 to 4 & 6 to 15

PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to set aside the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2016 made in O.S.No.21 of 2010 on teh file of the learned Second Additional District and Sessions Court, Vellore at Ranipet (Transferred O.S.No.104 of 2008 on the file of the learned Principal District Court, Vellore).

2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.S.NO.94 OF 2018

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

This Appeal Suit has been filed praying to set aside the judgment

and decree dated 23.12.2016 passed in O.S.No.21 of 2010 by the II

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore at Ranipet.

2.Learned counsel for the appellant is not ready. Hence, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

[R.S.M., J.] [R.S.V., J.]

10.04.2024

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking order / Non-Speaking order TK

3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.S.NO.94 OF 2018

To

1.The Second Additional District and Sessions Court Vellore at Ranipet.

2.The Joint Sub Registrar II Arakkonam, Vellore District.

3.The Inspector General of Registration 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028.

4.The Taluk Surveyor Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore District.

5.The Village Administrative Officer Kilkuppam Village & Post, Arakkonam Taluk.

6.The Tahsildar Arakkonam, Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore District.

7.The District Collector Vellore District, Sathuvachari, Vellore – 632 009.

4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.S.NO.94 OF 2018

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. AND R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

TK

A.S.NO.94 OF 2018

10.04.2024

5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ramani

Coram

AI extract

R.Subramanian
R.Sakthivel

CNR

HCMA010564102018

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

R. Subramanian R.sakthivel

Disposal

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Sathyabama,D/O.Ananda Nayar Vs K.R.Jayaramakrishnaraj

10 Apr 2024

Chinnaponnu Vs Ramalingam

10 Apr 2024