Dismissed
Chinnaponnu v. Ramalingam
Madras HCAS/395/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal suit by plaintiffs against judgment and decree of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore. Third appellant died with no steps to bring legal representatives on record, so appeal dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
A.S.NO.395 OF 2016
¶2
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED: 10.04.2024
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
¶6
A.S.NO.395 OF 2016
¶7
AND CMP NO.8979 OF 2016
¶8
- 1.Chinnaponnu
¶9
- 2.Gandhimathi
¶10
- 3.Mallika
¶11
- 4.Rajakumari
¶12
... Appellants / Plaintiffs
¶13
Vs.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Chinnaponnu
- petitioner
Gandhimathi
- petitioner
Mallika
- petitioner
Rajakumari
- respondent
Ramalingam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court