Pavayammal v. Karpagavalli
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a decree in a title suit was dismissed as abated because the third respondent had died and no steps were taken to bring in legal representatives. No costs.
What the court decided
A.S.NO.1253 OF 2015
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
A.S.NO.1253 OF 2015
AND
MP NO.1 OF 2015
1.Pavayammal 2.Manimegalai 3.Muruganasamy ... Appellants / Defendants 1, 2 & 5 Vs. 1.Karpagavalli 2.Minor Janani Praba ... Respondents 1 & 2/ Plaintiffs 3.Rukmani 4.Nagarathinam ... Respondents 3 & 4/ Defendants 3 & 4
PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to set aside the judgment and decree dated 09.07.2015 made in O.S.No.3 of 2011 on the file of I Additional District Court, Erode.
1/4
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pavayammal
- appellant
Manimegalai
- appellant
Muruganasamy
- respondent
Karpagavalli
- respondent
Minor Janani Praba
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court