Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. D.Senthil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court corrected an inadvertent observation in a previous order that dismissed the main appeal, clarifying that only the petition for acceptance of cause title was withdrawn.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.5406 of 2024 in A.S.Sr.No.99432 of 2023
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
Today the matter has been listed under the caption “for being mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. This petition was filed seeking acceptance of the cause title as set out in the appeal.
3. Since we had pointed out certain errors in the application, the learned counsel made an endorsement to withdraw this petition. While permitting him to withdraw this petition, we had inadvertently stated that the AS.Sr. will stand rejected.
4. The learned counsel would submit that it is only this petition for acceptance of cause title that was withdrawn and not the AS.Sr. The incorporation of the following sentence “Consequently, A.S.Sr.No.99432 of
2023 stands rejected” is a mistake.
1/2
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner
Coram
R. SUBRAMANIAN
R. SAKTHIVEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court