This decision rules on the fate of a writ petition seeking directions for transparent tendering of tank excavation works. The court found the petition infructuous based on counsel's submission and endorsed record.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)No.19609 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 30.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
WP(MD)No.19609 of 2017 and WMP(MD)No.15888 of 2017
C.T.Ramesh ... Petitioner
Vs
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing respondents to conduct tender for Tank Excavation works in Sivagangai District with transparent manner by following the TN Transparency in Tenders Act and Rules.
For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminthan For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyanandh
Additional Government Pleader
1/3
WP(MD)No.19609 of 2017
ORDER
When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement so.
2.Recording the above submission and the
endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
30.11.2023
Internet : Yes / No
DSK
To
2/3
WP(MD)No.19609 of 2017
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
dsk
WP(MD)No.19609 of 2017
30.11.2023
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.T.Ramesh
The District Collector, Sivagangai District
The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Organisation, Sivagangai
B.PUGALENDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
