The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition for being infructuous after the petitioner filed an endorsement stating the matter had become such. The petitioner had sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to take action regarding TV signal interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)Nos.14712 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 30.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
WP(MD)Nos.14712 of 2017
and
WMP(MD)No.11542 of 2017
M.Paramasivam ... Petitioner Vs
1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Dugar Towers, 6th Floor, Old No.34, New No.123,
Marshalls Road,
Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
2.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Kovilpatti Division, Thoothukudi District.
4.The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi Collectorate, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing directing the 1 and 2nd respondents
1/4
WP(MD)Nos.14712 of 2017
to take legal action against the 4th respondent for disturbing the petitioner's signal and consequently direct the 4th respondent to provide clear signal to the petitioner based on the petitioner's representation dated 21.07.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth
For Respondents : Mr.PT.Thiraviam,
Government Advocate
ORDER
When the writ petition is taken up for hearing,
the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement so.
2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
30.11.2023
Internet : Yes / No
2/4
WP(MD)Nos.14712 of 2017
To
1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Dugar Towers, 6th Floor, Old No.34, New No.123, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
2.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
4.The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi Collectorate, Thoothukudi District.
3/4
WP(MD)Nos.14712 of 2017
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
dsk
WP(MD)Nos.14712 of 2017
30.11.2023
4/4
M.Paramasivam
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited
The District Collector, Thoothukudi
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti
The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation, Thoothukudi
B.PUGALENDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
