Multiple writ petitions filed challenging a tender notification. Petitioners sought quashing and a direction to reschedule the tender. The court permitted withdrawal of petitions by petitioners' counsel and dismissed the matters as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) Nos.16149 to 16153 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 29.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD) Nos.16149 to 16153 of 2019
and W.P.(MD) No.15575 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.12839 to 12848 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.12248 and 12249 of 2019
W.P.(MD) No.16149 of 2019:
P.Nallusamy .. Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned tender notification issued by the 2nd respondent made in Koppu.No.2797/2018/A2 dated 24.06.2019 and quash the same as illegal
_________Page 1 of 7
W.P.(MD) Nos.16149 to 16153 of 2019
and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reschedule the tender notification by issuing schedule form to the petitioner within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.
W.P.(MD) No.16150 of 2019:
S.Jeganathan
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned tender notification issued by the 2nd respondent made in Koppu.No.2797/2018/A2 dated 24.06.2019 and set aside the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reschedule the tender notification by issuing schedule form to the petitioner within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.
_________Page 2 of 7
W.P.(MD) Nos.16149 to 16153 of 2019
W.P.(MD) No.16151 of 2019:
M.Muthanambalam
.. Petitioner
Vs.
.. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned tender notification issued by the 2nd respondent made in Koppu.No.2797/2018/A2 dated 24.06.2019 and set aside the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reschedule the tender notification by issuing schedule form to the petitioner within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.
W.P.(MD) No.16152 of 2019:
M.Ilayaraja
.. Petitioner
Vs.
_________Page 3 of 7
W.P.(MD) Nos.16149 to 16153 of 2019
.. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned tender notification issued by the 2nd respondent made in Koppu.No.2797/2018/A2 dated 24.06.2019 and set aside the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reschedule the tender notification by issuing schedule form to the petitioner within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.
W.P.(MD) No.16153 of 2019:
K.Alagar
.. Petitioner
Vs.
.. Respondents
_________Page 4 of 7
W.P.(MD) Nos.16149 to 16153 of 2019
Prayer:
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned tender notification issued by the 2nd respondent made in Na.Ka.No.1498/2019/A3 dated 24.06.2019 and set aside the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reschedule the tender notification by issuing schedule form to the petitioner within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.
W.P.(MD) No.15575 of 2019:
A.Vasanth
.. Petitioner
Vs.
.. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned tender notification issued by the 2nd respondent made in Koppu.No.2797/2018/A2 dated 24.06.2019 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reschedule the tender notification by issuing schedule form to the petitioner within a stipulated
_________Page 5 of 7
W.P.(MD) Nos.16149 to 16153 of 2019
time as may be fixed by this Court.
In all cases:
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jegadeesh Pandian For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyanath Additional Government Pleader
COMMON ORDER
Today, when the matters are taken up for hearing, the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these Writ Petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
29.11.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb
_________Page 6 of 7
W.P.(MD) Nos.16149 to 16153 of 2019
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ssb
To
W.P.(MD) Nos.16149 to 16153 of 2019
Dated : 29.11.2023
_________Page 7 of 7
P.Nallusamy
S.Jeganathan
M.Muthanambalam
M.Ilayaraja
K.Alagar
A.Vasanth
B.Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
