Petitioner sought to quash a tender notification under Article 226. During hearing, the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) No.12576 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 29.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD) No.12576 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.9353 and 9354 of 2019
Basker .. Petitioner
Vs.
2.The Commissioner, Srivilliputhur Municipality, Virudhunagar District. .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned tender notification of the 2nd respondent made in Na.Ka.No. 3192/2018/E1 Sl.No.2, dated 11.09.2018 and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jegadeesh Pandian For R1 : Mr.G.Suriyanath Government Advocate
_________Page 1 of 3
W.P.(MD) No.12576 of 2019
For R2
: Mr.P.Parekh Kumar Standing Counsel
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
29.11.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb
_________Page 2 of 3
W.P.(MD) No.12576 of 2019
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ssb
To
W.P.(MD) No.12576 of 2019
Dated : 29.11.2023
Page 3 of 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Basker
The District Collector, Virudhunagar District
The Commissioner, Srivilliputhur Municipality
B. Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
