Disposed

M.Kantha v. The District Reigstrar

Madras HC30 Jan 2023WP/2104/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, in W.P. No. 2104 of 2023, addressed a writ petition where the petitioner sought a direction to the District Registrar to expeditiously consider a representation alleging fraudulent encumbrances. The Court directed the Registrar to complete the inquiry and pass orders within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representation and pass final orders within twelve weeks after conducting an enquiry with opportunity of being heard.

M.Kantha Vs The District Reigstrar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.2104 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 30.01.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

¶6

Writ Petition No.2104 of 2023

¶7

M.Kantha

¶8

…. Petitioner

¶9

-Vs1.The District Registrar Chengalput District Chengalput – 603 001. 2.The Sub Registrar Cheyyur Taluk Chengalput District. Chengalput – 603 302.

¶10

3.Mr.T.Kanniappan 4.Mr.K.Ravi …. Respondents

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of his representation dated 17.10.2022 as expeditiously as possible.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Nelliappan For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Special Government Pleader – for RR 1 & 2 Notice dispensed with – for RR 3 and 4

¶13

1 / 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.2104 of 2023

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of his representation dated 17.10.2022 as expeditiously as possible.

¶18

In respect of the property situated at S.No.102/3, Kaavanur, Soonambedu, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalput District, it is the claim of the petitioner that the private respondents had fraudulently created encumbrance by registering certain documents. Therefore, in order to cancel the said documents after conducting an enquiry, the petitioner has given a complaint-cumrepresentation dated 17.10.2022 to the 1^st respondent and in order to consider the same on merits and to pass orders, the petitioner has moved the present writ petition.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2. In view of the order that is going to be passed, notice to the respondents 3 and 4 is hereby dispensed with.

¶20

Learned Special Government Pleader would submit that, the said representation / complaint dated 17.10.2022 under Section 77-A of the Act would be considered by the 1^st respondent within a time limit that may be stipulated by

¶21

2 / 4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No.2104 of 2023

¶24

this Court.

¶25

Considering the said submission made by the learned Special Government Pleader, this Court is inclined to dispose of this writ petition with the following order.

¶26

“That there shall be a direction to the 1^st respondent to consider the complaint-cum-representation of the petitioner dated 17.10.2022 within the meaning of Section 77-A of the Registration Act, 1908 and after conducting enquiry by giving an opportunity of being heard to both the petitioner as well as the private respondents, final orders shall be passed within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

¶27

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶28

30.01.2023

¶29

Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order KST

¶30

3 / 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No.2104 of 2023

¶33

R. SURESH KUMAR, J.

¶34

KST

¶35

¶36

1.The District Registrar Chengalput District Chengalput – 603 001.

¶37

2.The Sub Registrar Cheyyur Taluk Chengalput District. Chengalput – 603 302.

¶38

W.P.No. 2104 of 2023

¶39

30.01.2023

¶40

4 / 4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Kantha v. The District Reigstrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Kantha v. The District Reigstrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.S.Gunavathy Vs The Thasildhar

G.Arumugam Vs The District Collector

Vivekananthan Vs The District Collector

V.Radhakrishnan Vs The District Collector

A.Ravikumar Vs The Thasildar

N.M.Thyagarajan Vs The District Revenue officer