Disposed

Vivekananthan v. The District Collector

Madras HC25 Jan 2023WP/1786/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order in a writ petition directed the Revenue Tahsildar to consider a petitioner's application regarding a computer patta correction within six weeks, dismissing the petition otherwise.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 10.10.2022 and pass necessary orders thereon on merits within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Vivekananthan Vs The District Collector — Madras HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.P. No.1786 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 25.01.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

W.P. No.1786 of 2023

Vivekananthan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri District.

¶11

2.The Revenue Tahsildar, Harur Taluk, Harur, Dharmapuri District.

¶12

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Office of the Rasilampatti Village, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1 st and 2 nd respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.10.2022 in accordance with law.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Velmurugan

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish Special Government Pleader

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

1/4

W.P. No.1786 of 2023

O R D E R

The prayer sought for herein is for a writ of mandamus directing

¶21

the 1 st and 2 nd respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner

¶22

dated 10.10.2022 in accordance with law.

¶23

2. In respect of the land at Survey No.21/2B2 situated at Rasilampatti Village, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District, the petitioner has given a request to the respondents to make the correction in the computer patta by representation or application dated 10.10.2022 and in order to consider the same, the petitioner has moved the present writ petition.

¶24

3. Heard Mr.M.Velmurugan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Heard Mr.P.Sathish, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶25

4. The learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents would submit that, the said application submitted by the petitioner dated 10.10.2022 would be considered by the 2 nd respondent and needful would be undertaken on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

W.P. No.1786 of 2023

¶29

5. Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for herein

¶30

and having regard to the said submission made by the learned Special

¶31

Government Pleader for the respondents, this Court is inclined to dispose

¶32

of this writ petition with the following orders:

¶33

There shall be a direction to the 2 nd respondent to

¶34

consider the application of the petitioner dated 10.10.2022

¶35

and pass necessary orders thereon on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶36

6. With this direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶37

25.01.2023

¶38

Index : Yes / No

¶39

Speaking Order : Yes / No Sgl

¶40

¶41

1.The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri District.

¶42

2.The Revenue Tahsildar, Harur Taluk, Harur, Dharmapuri District.

¶43

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Office of the Rasilampatti Village, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/4

W.P. No.1786 of 2023

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

Sgl

W.P.No.1786 of 2023

25.01.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

4/4

Vivekananthan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivekananthan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Rathish Kumar Vs The Joint-Ii Sub Registrar

C.M.Babu Vs The District Collector

Selvaraj Vs The District Revenue Officer

S.S.Gunavathy Vs The Thasildhar

G.Arumugam Vs The District Collector

P.v.Sadhunraj Vs The Commissioner