A Civil Revision Petition under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act was settled as a compromise in a Lok Adalat presided over by Justice P. Dhanabal. The parties filed a compromise memo, and the court passed an award enforcing the settlement and refunding court fees.
Settlement based on a filed compromise memo; Award passed; Court fees refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 14th day of October, 2023 LOK ADALAT AWARD
(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)
Presided over by
The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and
Members
C.R.P.No.879 of 2022
This Civil Revision Petition is filed under section 25 of Tamil nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act 18 of 1960 against the judgment and decree dated 14.02.2020 by the Hon'ble VIII Judge of Small Causes Court (Apellate Authority), at Chennai in R.C.A.No. 342 of 2015 confirming the order and decree passed in R.C.O.P.No.1870 of 2014 dated 29.06.2015 by Learned XI Rent Controller, Small Cause Court at Chennai.
Sheik Pakkir .. Petitioner
Vs.
Boopathy ...Respondent
This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both parties are present. The learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.S.N.Narasimhulu and Mr.R.Murugabharathi, learned counsel for the respondent are present. The matter is settled as follows:
1/4
2
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both parties are present. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent are present.
Sheik Pakkir Counsel for the Petitioner
Mrs.B.Chandra Counsel for the Respondent
This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.
The Court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the
2/4
3
manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.
Judge
Member
Member
To
The parties/Advocate concerned
Copy to:
2.The XI Rent Controller, Small Cause Court at Chennai.
2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.
4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras+2 copies
cda/drl
3/4
4
P. DHANABAL, J.
cda/drl
C.R.P.No.879 of 2022
14.10.2023
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending revision petition can be settled by compromise before the Lok Adalat?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sheik Pakkir
Boopathy
P. DHANABAL
J.Justin David
E.V.Chandru
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
