Dismissed

The Manager v. Santhi

Madras HC14 Oct 2023CMA/97/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Legal Services Committee settled a civil miscellaneous appeal arising from an employees compensation case. The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal after depositing the award amount with interest. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, closed the connected petition, and ordered the refund of court fees.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; connected petition closed; court fee to be refunded per Act.

The Manager Vs Santhi — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee

¶3

Saturday, the 14^th day of October, 2023 LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶4

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶5

Presided over by

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and

¶7

Members

¶8

Mr.J.Justin David, District Judge (Retd)

¶9

Mr.E.V.Chandru, Advocate

¶10

C.M.A.97 of 2021

¶11

(This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the judgement and decree in W.C.No.383 of 2014 dated 15.08.2014 on the file of the Commissioner for Employees Compensation, Assistant Commissioner, Salem.

¶12

The Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office, Sri Lakshmi Complex, 1^st Floor, Bharathi Street, Omalur Main Road, Swarnapuri, Salem. .. Appellant Vs.

¶13

1.Santhi 2.Ranjith kumar 3.Nallammal 4.Thangammal ...Respondents

¶14

On representation of the learned counsel for the appellant side, this case is taken up for settlement before the National Lok Adalat. Mr.K.Moorthy, learned counsel for the appellant is present. The matter is settled as follows:

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

¶18

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶19

The Appellant preferred the Appeal as against the award passed in W.C.No.383 of 2014 dated 15.08.2014 on the file of the

¶20

Commissioner for Employees Compensation, Assistant Commissioner, Salem.

¶21

Today, 14.10.2023, the Appellant seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal filed by him. Further, the Appellant represented that already deposited the entire award amount including interest. And, he also made an endorsement in the case bundle to that effect.

¶22

In view of the above submission, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶23

The Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office, Sri Lakshmi Complex, 1^st Floor, Bharathi Street, Omalur Main Road, Swarnapuri, Salem.

¶24

Counsel for the Appellant

¶25

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

¶29

The Court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the

¶30

manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and

¶31

Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

Judge

Member

Member

The parties/Advocate concerned

¶37

Copy to:

¶38

1.The Commissioner for Employees Compensation, zAssistant Commissioner, Salem.

¶39

2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

¶40

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶41

4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras+2 copies

¶42

cda/drl

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/4

P. DHANABAL, J.

cda/drl

C.M.A.97 of 2021

14.10.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

4/4

The Manager v. Santhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Manager v. Santhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mary Theresa[Decs]Rep by Her Vs G.Vasantha

S. Dayalan @ Selvam Vs D. Namratha

S. Vanchiappan, Vs K. Palanisamy @ Mani (Dead)

Sheik Pakkir Vs B.Chandra

Sheik Pakkir Vs M.S.Boopathy

The Branch Manager Vs Palaniyammal