Lok Adalat award settling Civil Revision Petition under Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960. Parties filed compromise memo dated 14.10.2023. Court passed award approving settlement and ordered refund of court fees.
Settlement award passed approving compromise memo dated 14.10.2023 filed by both parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 14th day of October, 2023
LOK ADALAT AWARD
(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)
Presided over by
The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and
Members
C.R.P.No.1118 of 2021
This Civil Revision Petition is filed under section 25 of Tamil nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act 18 of 1960 against the fair and decreetal order dated 27.01.2021 passed by the learned X Rent Controller of Small Causes Court at Chennai in M.P.S.R.No.28420 of 2020 in R.L.T.O.P.No.311 of 2019.
Sheik Pakkir .. Petitioner
Vs.
Mrs.B.Chandra ...Respondent
This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both parties are present. The learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.S.N.Narasimhulu and Mr.R.Murugabharathi, learned counsel for the respondent are present. The matter is settled as follows:
1/4
2
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both parties are present. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent are present.
Based on the compromise memo, the settlement award is passed. The compromise memo shall form part of the award.
Sheik Pakkir Counsel for the Petitioner
Mrs.B.Chandra Counsel for the Respondent
This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.
The Court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the manner
provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4
3
sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.
Judge
Member
Member
To
The parties/Advocate concerned
Copy to:
2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.
4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras+2 copies
cda/drl
3/4
4
P. DHANABAL, J.
cda/drl
C.R.P.No.1118 of 2021
14.10.2023
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Complaint Rent LTO Petitioner is settled ex-parte or by compromise?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sheik Pakkir
Mrs.B.Chandra
P. DHANABAL
J.Justin David
E.V.Chandru
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
P. DHANABAL and J.Justin David and E.V.Chandru
Parties & counsel
