Disposed

Pandurangan S v. the Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Ombudsman

Madras HC4 Mar 2022WP(MD)/2122/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the Superintendent of Police to conduct an enquiry with notice and opportunity to the petitioner within eight weeks regarding encroachments on Balavinayagar temple lands, while disposing of WP(MD) No.2122 of 2022 under Article 226.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the fourth respondent to conduct enquiry, after issuance of notice and giving opportunity to the petitioner, and to pass orders on merits within eight weeks.

Pandurangan S Vs the Tamil Nadu Local Bodies… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

WP(MD). No.2122 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED:04.03.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

WP(MD). No.2122 of 2022

¶7

S.Pandurangan ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The Tamilnadu Local Bodies Ombudsman Having Office at 100, Annasalai, Guindy,

¶10

Chennai 600 032.

¶11

The Director of Municipal Administration, No. 78, Urban Administration Building, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028.

¶12

The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli.

¶13

The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Collectorate Buildings, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

¶14

The Commissioner, Virudhunagar Municipality, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 4^th respondent to take necessary action for implementation of the order passed by the first respondent dated 06.11.2019, in the petitioner's grievance petition No.171/2017/Municipality within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶16

For Petitioner: Mr.P.Mahendran

¶17

For R2 to R4 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor For R5 : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss For R1 : Mr.Shanmuga Raja Sethupathi

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/3

¶20

WP(MD). No.2122 of 2022

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the fourth respondent, to take necessary action for implementation of the order passed by the first respondent dated 06.11.2019, in the petitioner's grievance petition No.171/2017/Municipality, within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶23

2.On perusal of the above order passed on 06.11.2019, the fourth respondent is directed to take appropriate action against the petition filed by the petitioner, in respect of encroachments made in the lands belonging to the Balavinayagar temple, Ward No.3, Pullalakottai Road, Indiranagar, Virudhunagar Town. However, it is pending on the file of the fourth respondent, without any progress.

¶24

3.Considering the above, the fourth respondent is directed to conduct enquiry, after issuance of notice to the petitioner and after giving opportunity to the petitioner and to pass orders on merits, within eight weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

4.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶26

// True Copy //

¶27

PNM

¶28

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶29

¶30

The Tamilnadu Local Bodies Ombudsman Having Office at 100, Annasalai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

¶31

The Director of Municipal Administration, No. 78, Urban Administration Building, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028.

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/3

¶34

WP(MD). No.2122 of 2022

¶35

The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli.

¶36

The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Collectorate Buildings, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

¶37

The Commissioner, Virudhunagar Municipality, Virudhunagar District. 6. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶38

+1 CC to M/s.D.SHANMUGARAJA SETHUPATHI, Advocate ( SR-9995[F] dated 04/03/2022 )

¶39

+1 CC to M/s.P.MAHENDRAN, Advocate ( SR-10540[F] dated 08/03/2022 )

¶40

ORDER IN WP(MD) No.2122 of 2022 Date : 04/03/2022

¶41

SB(CO) TR(18.03.2022) 3P 9C

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

3/3

Pandurangan S v. the Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Ombudsman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pandurangan S v. the Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Ombudsman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palees Vs The Inspector of Police

T.Alagu Vs The District Superintendent of Police

Monisha Vs The Superintendent of Police

M. Mathankumar Vs The Director General of Police

M.Nagarajan Vs Sadhu Ramesh M

Ananth @ Anand Vs The Inspector of Police