Dismissed

M.Nagarajan v. Sadhu Ramesh M

Madras HC4 Mar 2022CONT P(MD)/100/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act punishing the respondent for disobedience of an earlier order to complete investigation and file a final report. The court accepted submission that investigation was completed and report filed, thereby closing the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed; no costs awarded to the petitioner.

M.Nagarajan Vs Sadhu Ramesh M — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Cont. P(MD)No.100 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 04.03.2022 CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

Cont. P(MD)No.100 of 2022 in CRL.OP.(MD)No.13513 of 2019

¶6

M.Nagarajan ... Petitioner Vs. M.Sadhu Ramesh, Inspector of Police, Traffic Investigation Wing II, Madurai City, Madurai. (Crime No.323 of 2018) ...Contemnor/ Respondent

¶7

Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent herein for her willful and wanton disobedience of the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court, Madurai Bench in Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 13513 of 2019 dated 26.09.2019 under the Contempt of Courts Act.

¶8

Prayer in CRL OP(MD).No.13513 of 2019:-

¶9

Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crme No.323 of 2018 and to file the final report within the time frame that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Duraipandian For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi

¶11

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petition has been filed to punish the respondent herein for her willful and wanton disobedience of the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court, Madurai Bench in Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 13513 of 2019 dated 26.09.2019, thereby the respondent is directed to complete the investigation in Cr.No.323 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police and to file final report within 8 weeks from the date of order.

¶14

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that now the respondent police completed the investigation and filed the final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, on 03.03.2022. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

1/2

¶16

Cont. P(MD)No.100 of 2022

¶17

3.Recording the said submission, the contempt petition is closed. No costs.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar (AE)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

PNM

¶23

Note :

¶24

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶25

¶26

The Inspector of Police, Traffic Investigation Wing II Madurai City, Madurai.

¶27

The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶28

+1 CC to M/s.K.S.DURAIPANDIYAN, Advocate ( SR-10141[F] dated 04/03/2022 )

¶29

Cont. P(MD)No.100 of 2022 in CRL.O.P.(MD)No.13513 of 2019 04.03.2022

¶30

RK(17/03/2022) 2P 4C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

M.Nagarajan v. Sadhu Ramesh M

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Nagarajan v. Sadhu Ramesh M

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palees Vs The Inspector of Police

T.Alagu Vs The District Superintendent of Police

Monisha Vs The Superintendent of Police

M. Mathankumar Vs The Director General of Police

Ananth @ Anand Vs The Inspector of Police

Pandurangan S Vs the Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Ombudsman