Disposed

T.Alagu v. The District Superintendent of Police

Madras HC3 Mar 2022CRL OP(MD)/2854/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench disposed of the Criminal Original Petition after the respondent Government Advocate submitted that the police enquiry was conducted and closed on 05.02.2021. The court closed the petition, leaving the petitioner at liberty to file a private complaint.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition is closed. Petitioner is at liberty to file a private complaint.

T.Alagu Vs The District Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Crl.O.P(MD)No.2854 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.03.2022 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P(MD)No.2854 of 2021

T.Alagu

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

¶8

The Inspector of Police, Devathanapatti Police Station, Devathanapatti ... Respondents

¶9

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents to consider the respresentation and investigate the complaint made by the petitioner dated 09.02.2020 and 11.03.2020.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ranjith For Respondents : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 & R2

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the respresentation and investigate the complaint made by the petitioner dated 09.02.2020 and 11.03.2020.

¶13

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that based on the complaint of the petitioner, enquiry was conducted and closed on 05.02.2021.

¶14

3.Recording the said submissions, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file private complaint.

¶15

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶16

// True Copy //

¶17

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶18

PNM

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/2

¶21

Crl.O.P(MD)No.2854 of 2021

¶22

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶23

¶24

1.The District Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

¶25

The Inspector of Police, Devathanapatti Police Station, Devathanapatti.

¶26

+1 CC to M/s.R.SARAVANAN, Advocate ( SR-10471[F] dated 07/03/2022 )

¶27

Crl.O.P(MD)No.2854 of 2021 03.03.2022

¶28

RD(17.03.2022) 2P 4C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/2

T.Alagu v. The District Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Alagu v. The District Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganesan Vs The Inspector of Police

S.T.Umayal Vs The Inspector of Police

L.Sakkubai Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Police

Palees Vs The Inspector of Police

Monisha Vs The Superintendent of Police

Kavi @ Sundara Kaviswarar Vs The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate cum Sub Collector