Disposed

Monisha v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC3 Mar 2022CRL OP(MD)/2547/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court closed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court accepted the respondent police's submission that a case was registered and subsequently closed as 'action dropped', thereby dismissing the petitioner's prayer. The petitioner was allowed to file a protest petition.

What did the court decide?

The criminal original petition was closed; the petitioner was permitted to file a protest petition.

Monisha Vs The Superintendent of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2547 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 03.03.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2547 of 2021

¶7

Monisha ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District.

¶10

The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Colachel, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.to direct the 2^nd respondent to comply the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel in CMP.No.1654 of 2020 dated 29.09.2020 and consequently register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 14.07.2020.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed direct the 2^nd respondent to comply the order passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate Eraniel in CMP.No.1654 of 2020 dated 29.09.2020 and consequently register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 14.07.2020.

¶15

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that based on the complaint of the petitioner, enquiry was conducted and after completion of investigation, the second respondent police registered a case in Crime No.05 of 2021 and the same was also closed as 'action dropped'.

¶16

3.Recording the said submissions, this Criminal Original https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file

¶17

1/2

¶18

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2547 of 2021

¶19

protest petition, against the referred charge sheet, in the manner known to law.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar (AS)

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

PNM

¶25

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶26

To: 1. The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, Kanyakumari District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Colachel, Kanyakumari District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.A.BALAKRISHNAN, Advocate ( SR-9954[F] dated 04/03/2022 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2547 of 2021 03.03.2022 RK(15/03/2022) 2P 6C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

2/2

Monisha v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Monisha v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganesan Vs The Inspector of Police

S.T.Umayal Vs The Inspector of Police

L.Sakkubai Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Police

Palees Vs The Inspector of Police

T.Alagu Vs The District Superintendent of Police

Kavi @ Sundara Kaviswarar Vs The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate cum Sub Collector