The petitioner filed a writ petition to quash allotment proceedings and direct a fresh allotment of a shop. The court held the petition infructuous as the shop was subsequently allotted to the petitioner and dismissed it.
Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus discharged as the petition became infructuous following allotment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.No.31752 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
WP.No.31752 of 2015 & M.P.No.1 of 2015
P.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner
Vs
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under the Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the proceedings dated 19.03.2015 in letter no.K2/2794/2003 on the file of the
WP.No.31752 of 2015
second respondent and to quash the same as illegal and without jurisdiction and to further direct the respondents to make a fresh allotment of Shop No:J 112 in Koyambedu vegetable market in accordance with the Order of the Supreme Court dated 26.11.2013 in SLP [c] 8202 of 2011.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari For Respondents : Mrs.P.Veena Suresh – R1 & R2
Mrs.Dakshyani Reddy – R3
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings of the second respondent dated 19.03.2015 as illegal and without jurisdiction and to further direct the respondents to make a fresh allotment of Shop No:J 112 in Koyambedu vegetable market in accordance with the Order of the Supreme Court dated 26.11.2013 in SLP [c] 8202 of 2011.
WP.No.31752 of 2015
respondents, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
12.12.2022
vrc
To
WP.No.31752 of 2015
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vrc
WP.No.31752 of 2015
12.12.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition to quash allotment proceedings survives after the subject shop has been allotted to the petitioner.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
SLP [c] 8202 of 2011Referred¶21
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Senthilkumar
The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
The Chief Executive Officer, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
N.Indra
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
