Disposed

Marimuthu v. The District Collector

Madras HC12 Dec 2022WP/24838/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a concrete house under the KALAIGNAR HOUSING SCHEME. Upon receiving a submission that the petitioner's application was registered with priority, the court directed the fourth respondent to expedite the house allotment process.

What did the court decide?

The fourth respondent is directed to expedite the process in allotting the house as expeditiously as possible.

Marimuthu Vs The District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Writ Petition No.24838 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 12/12/2022

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

Writ Petition No.24838 of 2022

Marimuthu

Petitioner

The District Collector Thiruvarur District.

¶11

The Assistant Director

¶12

The Rural Development and

¶13

Panchayat Raj Department (RDPR)

¶14

Thiruvarur

¶15

Thiruvarur District.

¶16

The Tahsildar

¶17

Nannilam Taluk

¶18

Thiruvarur District.

¶19

The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Nannilam Taluk Thiruvarur Thiruvarur District.

¶20

Respondents

¶21

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶22

praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the fourth respondent

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No:1/6

¶24

Writ Petition No.24838 of 2022

¶25

to provide concrete house to the petitioner under KALAIGNAR HOUSING SCHEME (2010 – 2016) to the vacant site situated in Old No.51 A New No.26 Part/Serial No.198/61 Keezhakudi Village, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvarur District, pursuant to the representation dated 18/4/2022 given to the first respondent.

¶26

For Petitioner ... Mr.M.Rajkumar For respondents ... Mr.S.Rajesh Government Advocate for R.R.1 to 3. Mrs.V.Yamunadevi Special Government Pleader for R.4

¶27

¶28

O R D E R

¶29

This writ petition has been filed to direct the fourth respondent to provide concrete house to the petitioner under KALAIGNAR HOUSING SCHEME (2010 – 2016) to the vacant site situated in Old No.51 A New No.26 Part/Serial No.198/61 Keezhakudi Village, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvarur District, pursuant to the representation, dated 18/4/2022 given to the first respondent.

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Page No:2/6

¶32

Writ Petition No.24838 of 2022

¶33

The case of the petitioner is that the respondents have come forward

¶34

to provide a concrete house under KALAIGNAR HOUSING SCHEME (2010

¶35

– 2016). On the instruction of the fourth respondent, on 21/6/2021, the

¶36

petitioner had demolished his hut. Thereafter, the respondents have not come forward to provide concrete house to the petitioner, instead they have provided to various persons who are already having houses. Hence, the petitioner had submitted a representation, dated 18/4/2022, to the first respondent. Since the same has not been answered, so far, petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition praying for the relief, as stated therein.

¶37

Heard Mr.M.Rajkumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.S.Rajesh, learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mrs.V.Yamunadevi, learned Special Government Pleader for the fourth respondent.

¶38

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the fourth respondent produced a letter, dated 15/9/2022 of the fourth respondent and submitted that the name of the petitioner has already been registered and his name is also uploaded in the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No:3/6

¶39

Writ Petition No.24838 of 2022

¶40

website. He further submitted that application of the petitioner would be considered in priority and action will be taken, as expeditiously as possible.

¶41

Considering the submission of the learned Special Government

¶42

Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. The fourth respondent is directed to expedite the process in allotting the house, as expeditiously as possible. No costs.

¶43

12/12/2022

¶44

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order

¶45

mvs.

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

Page No:4/6

¶48

Writ Petition No.24838 of 2022

¶49

¶50

The District Collector Thiruvarur District.

¶51

The Assistant Director

¶52

The Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department (RDPR) Thiruvarur

¶53

Thiruvarur District.

¶54

The Tahsildar

¶55

Nannilam Taluk Thiruvarur District.

¶56

The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Nannilam Taluk Thiruvarur Thiruvarur District.

¶57

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶58

Page No:5/6

¶59

Writ Petition No.24838 of 2022

¶60

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J

¶61

mvs.

¶62

W.P.No.24838 of 2022

¶63

12/12/2022

¶64

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶65

Page No:6/6

Marimuthu v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Marimuthu v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Rangasay Vs Arulmighu Azhiya Ilangai amman Temple

Mrs.P.Poongothai Vs the District Collector

R.Jayaprakash, Vs the Joint Commissioner

G.Doraisamy Vs The Commissioner

Mrs.v.Vimalabai Vs v.Munusamy

P.Senthil Kumar Vs The Member Secretary