Dismissed

R.Jayaprakash, v. the Joint Commissioner

Madras HC9 Dec 2022WP/20006/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition to quash an eviction notice issued by the second respondent. The respondents submitted that paragraphs under the relevant Act against the petitioner were dropped due to payment of arrears. The court found no survival for adjudication and dismissed the petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

R.Jayaprakash, Vs the Joint Commissioner — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

WP.No.20006 of 2013

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09.12.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.20006 of 2013 &

¶7

M.P.No.1 of 2013 & WMP.No.39137 of 2018

R.Jayaprakash

... Petitioner

The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department, Villupuram.

¶12

The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Anjaneya Swamy Devasthanam, Thiru Vi.Ka Road, Villupuram.

¶13

D.Kumar, Hereditary Trustee, Sri Anjaneya Swamy Devashthanam, Thiru Vi.Ka. Road, Villupuram. ... Respondents

¶14

Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under the Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent vide his notice dated 26.04.2013 and quash the same.

¶15

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

WP.No.20006 of 2013

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Kannan

¶18

For Respondents : Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader [HR & CE] – R1 & R2

¶19

Mr.N.Suresh – R3

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This writ petition has been filed to quash the notice dated 26.04.2013

¶22

sent by the second respondent for evicting the petitioner from the premises.

¶23

When the matter is taken up today, the learned Special Government

¶24

Pleader appearing for the first and second respondents submitted that during the proceedings under section 78 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, the petitioner has paid the entire arrears of rent and therefore, the entire proceedings against the petitioner has been dropped and also produced a letter of the first respondent to that effect. The said submission made by the learned Special Government Pleader is

¶25

recorded.

¶26

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

WP.No.20006 of 2013

¶28

In such view of the matter, nothing survives for adjudication in

¶29

this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

¶30

09.12.2022

¶31

vrc

¶32

The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department, Villupuram.

¶33

The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Anjaneya Swamy Devasthanam, Thiru Vi.Ka Road, Villupuram.

¶34

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

WP.No.20006 of 2013

¶36

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶37

vrc

¶38

WP.No.20006 of 2013

¶39

09.12.2022

¶40

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Jayaprakash, v. the Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Jayaprakash, v. the Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Thangappan Vs Secretary to Govt of India

The South Indian Iron & Vs the Secretary

The South Indian Iron & Vs the Secretary

M.Rangasay Vs Arulmighu Azhiya Ilangai amman Temple

Mrs.P.Poongothai Vs the District Collector

E.Kamatchi Subramani, Vs the Joint Commissioner