Krishnamurthi v. Kulsum Fathima
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal disposed of by recording a compromise memo dated 01.01.2022 signed by both parties, per the decree and judgment of the lower courts.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal disposed of based on the recorded terms of the Compromise Memo dated 01.01.2022.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.03.2022 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
S.A.No.350 of 2007
and M.P. Nos.1 & 2 of 2007
Krishnamurthi ...Appellant/Defendant
Vs. Kulsum Fathima ...Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 20.01.2006 passed in A.S. No.19 of 2005, on the file of the District Judge, Cuddalore, upholding the decree and judgment dated 11.01.2005 passed in O.S. No.153 of 1999, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Panruti.
For Appellant : Mr. S. Kingston Jerold For Respondent : Mr.V. Lakshminarayanan
JUDGMENT
A Compromise Memo dated 01.01.2022 has been filed in the present appeal signed by both the appellant and the respondent and their respective counsels. The same is hereby recorded.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Krishnamurthi
- respondent
Kulsum Fathima
Coram
R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court