Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

S.Manonmani Vs T.Santharam(Deceased) — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

Home
Madras HC
2022
S.Manonmani Vs T.Santharam(Deceased)S.Manonmani v. T.Santharam(Deceased)

Dismissed

S.Manonmani v. T.Santharam(Deceased)

Madras HC9 Mar 2022SA/758/2001

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Judicature at Madras without any analysis of the appeal's merits.

What did the court decide?

Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.03.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No.758 of 2001

1.S.Manonmani

2.Subadra Devi 3.Minor. Damayanthi 4.Minor. Renuka Devi

(minor appellants 3 & 4 are represented by their mother and natural guardian the 2nd appellant)

5.Soudeswari

6.Parameswaran (Insane person rep by the 5^th Appellant Sowdeswari) 7.Anusuya

8.T.Subathra

9.S.Thilagar (Died)

10.T.Nithyadevi

11.Minor. T.Rubanamithra (Rep. by her mother Meenakshi) (Appellants 10 & 11 brought on record as LRs of the deceased A9 viz., S.Thilagar vide Court order dated 18.06.2019 made in C.M.P.Nos.11644, 11647 & 11648/2019 in S.A.No.758 of 2001) ... 1 to 9 Appellants, 10 & 11 Appellants (LR's of the 9^th Respondent/ Respondents/Defendants Vs. 1.T.Santharam (Died) ... Respondents/Appellants/Plaintiff 2.S.Padmavathi

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Code of Civil Procedure100

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
S. Manonmani
appellant
Subadra Devi
appellant
Damayanthi
appellant
Renuka Devi
appellant
Soudeswari
appellant

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 9 Mar 2022 · March
Registered: 28 Feb 2000
Case no.: SA/758/2001

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R. Hemalatha

Senbagavalli (Deceased) Vs Damodharan
4 Mar 2022
P.Sundareswar Vs Pinky Jain
4 Mar 2022
M/S Indice Net Pvt. Ltd. Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
3 Mar 2022
M.Mukhya Prana Rao,(Deceased) Vs a.R.Prathabhan
9 Mar 2022

Cite this judgement

S.Manonmani v. T.Santharam(Deceased), SA/758/2001 (MAD), decided on 9 March 2022.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Code of Civil Procedure100

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

R. Hemalatha

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

In the second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the courts' permission to withdraw the appeal was granted based on a memo filed by counsel, and the appeal was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

3.S.Venkateswaran

4.S.Balaji (Deceased)

5.S.Karthikeyan

6.T.Sanna Maniyamal

7.Poornima Prabhakaran

8.Geetha

9.Sankara Narayanan

10.Minor. Naveen Santharam ... Respondents/Plaintiff

(RR2 to 7 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole respondent vide order of Court dated 08.03.2007 made in C.M.P.Nos.15901 to 15903/2005 in S.A.No.758 of 2001)

(RR8 to 10 brought on record as LRs of the deceased R4 vide order of Court dated 27.11.2018 made in C.M.P.No.2016 of 2018 in S.A.No.758 of 2001)

(Cause title accepted vide as per order of Court dated 23.04.2001 in C.M.P.No.6813 of 2001)

Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 22.01.1999 passed in A.S. No.8 of 1999, on the file of the II Additional District Court, Salem, reversing the decree and judgment dated 28.11.1997 passed in O.S. No.516 of 1996, on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Salem.

For AA5, 6 & 9 : Ms.P.V.Rajeswari For AA7, 8 & 10 : Mr.T.S.Baskaran for Mr.R.Vasudevan For RR2, 3, 5 to 10 : Mr.D.Shivakumaran

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

JUDGMENT

The learned counsels appearing for the appellants seek permission of this Court to withdraw this second appeal. In this regard, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants 2 to 4 filed a Memo dated 08.03.2022 and the learned counsel appearing for the appellants 7, 8, 10 & 11 made an endorsement on the case bundle to that effect.

2. In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

Mtl

To

The II Additional District Judge, The II Additional District Court, Salem.

The II Additional District Munsif, Salem.

Copy To

The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.D.Shivakumaran, Advocate SR.No.15926 +1cc to Mr.T.S.Baskaran, Advocate SR.No.16002 +2cc to Mr.P.V.Rajeswari, Advocate SR.No.16641

S.A.No.758 of 2001 GPL(CO) GN(28/03/2022)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Parameswaran

Coram

AI extract

R. Hemalatha

CNR

HCMA010070432001

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED

Youth Social Service Union Vs J.P.Durai

9 Mar 2022

K.C.Muthusamy Vs Sulochana

10 Mar 2022