K.C.Muthusamy v. Sulochana
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal abated due to the death of the sole appellant without impleading legal heirs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :10.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
K.C.Muthusamy ... Appellant
Vs.
Sulochana ... Respondent
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 06.10.2009 in A.S. No.120 of 2008, on the file of the Sub Court, Rasipuram, upholding the decree and judgment dated 25.04.2006, in O.S. No.45 of 1999, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Rasipuram.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Sudhakar For Respondent : Mr.A.Kalyanaraman
JUDGMENT
It is seen from the records that the sole appellant died long back and till date no steps have been taken to implead the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that though she sent a letter to the party there is no response.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.C.Muthusamy
- respondent
Sulochana
Coram
R. HEMALATHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court