Jp Durai v. M Sundaresan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed as no substantial question of law arose. High Court upheld factual findings that plaintiff failed to prove capacity as school secretary.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed; prior decree and judgment upholding dismissal of injunction suit were upheld; no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTIC E R.HEMALATHA
S.A.No.301 of 2007
and M.P.No.1 of 2007
J.P.Durai
Secretary,
Bargur Education and Welfare Trust
High School, Bargur,
Bhavani Taluk, Erode District.
...Appellant / Appellant / Plaintiff
Vs.
M.Sundaresan
... Respondent / Respondent/ Defendant
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the findings of the trial court were correct in dismissing the suit on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove his capacity as secretary of the school.
Whether the High Court is justified in dismissing the appeal for lack of a substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.
Whether the plaintiff was entitled to maintain the suit in his individual capacity despite not adding evidence of committee membership.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
J.P.Durai
- respondent
M.Sundaresan
Coram
E R.HEMALATHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court