Muniammal v. Kullandi
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal, the Single Judge held that the Civil Appeal abated under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code due to the death of the sole respondent, noting that no steps were taken to implead legal heirs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTIC E R.HEMALATHA
S.A.NO.1578 OF 1999
Muniammal ... Appellant
.Vs.
Kullandi ... Respondent
PRAYER:-
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 22.02.1999 in A.S.No.24 of 1997, on the file of the Additional District Court, Thiruvannamalai, confirming the decree and judgment dated 30.12.1996, in O.S.No.806 of 1989, on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Thiruvannamalai.
For Appellant : Mr.Kasirajan
JUDGMENT
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a second appeal stands abated due to the death of the sole respondent without impleading legal heirs?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Muniammal
- respondent
Kullandi
Coram
E.R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court