Sundarappa Gounder v. Arumugam
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to absent applicant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
Sundarappa Gounder ..Appellant/2nd Respondent/ 2nd Defendant
Vs.
1.Arumugam ..1st Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff 2.Muthusamy(Given up) ..2nd Respondents/1st Respondent/1st Defendant
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.30 of 2005 on the file of the Sub-Court, Pollachi dated 27.10.2006 reversing the judgment and decree passed in OS.No.957 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pollachi dated 14.06.2005.
For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.T.P.Manoharan for R1 R2 – given up
No representation for the Appellant. Respondent's counsel is present. Since the counsel, who undertook to file Vakalat on behalf of the Appellant did not file Vakalat, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the Appellant in the cause list. Pursuant to the same, the name of the Appellant is printed in the cause list. Since there is no representation, this second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sundarappa Gounder
- respondent
1.Arumugam
- respondent
2.Muthusamy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court