1.CHINNA Piilai v. 1.N.K.SUBARAYAN
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal filed by appellants was dismissed by the High Court as it was non-prosecution since the appellants' counsel could not contact the client.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTIC E R.HEMALATHA
S.A.NO.1123 OF 1998
- Chinna Pillai 2. Raja 3. Manickam 4. Mani 5. Raman 6. Lakshmi 7. Indirani 8. Valarmathi ... Plaintiffs 2 to 9/ Respondents/Appellants
.Vs.
- N.K.Subbarayan 2. Senthil Kumar 3. Saravanan ... Defendants/Appellants/ Respondents PRAYER:-
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 08.02.1996 passed in A.S. No.18 of 1995, on the file of the Principal District Court, Salem, upholding the decree and judgment dated 31.10.1994 passed in O.S. No.415 of 1985, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Salem.
For Appellants : Ms.Shabana For Mr.T.P.Manoharan For Respondents : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chinna Pillai
- appellant
Raja
- appellant
Manickam
- appellant
Mani
- appellant
Raman
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court