Second Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of vakalat despite captioning as 'for dismissal'. No substantive legal reasoning provided.
Dismissal of Second Appeals for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.Nos.1378 & 1379 of 1997
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A. Nos.1378 & & 1379 of 1997 and
C.M.P. Nos. 13652 & 13653 of 1997 & 5022 & 5033 of 1998
S.A. No.1378 of 1997
COMMON PRAYER : Second Appeals filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgement dated 30.08.1995 in A.S.No.51 of 1994 and A.S.No.54 of 1994 respectively on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee, reversing the decree and judgment dated 29.04.1994 in O.S.No.1911 of 1993 and O.S.No.1914 of 1993 respectively on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tambaram.
For Appellant : No appearance (in both the appeals)
S.A.Nos.1378 & 1379 of 1997
R. HEMALATHA, J. bga
COMMON JUDGMENT
It is seen from the records that though Mr.S.Thangavel, Advocate, undertook to file vakalat on behalf of the appellants in the above appeals, till date no vakalat has been filed. It is also seen that on several occasions the above second appeals were posted under the caption "for dismissal".
non prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
15.02.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No bga
To
2.The District Munsif, Tambaram.
S.A.Nos.1378 & & 1379 of 1997
R. Suseela
A. Rajamani
1. Kanniyammal 2. Sundarammal 3. Muthammal 4. Dhanakkodi 5. D. Elumalai
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
