The petitioner sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the criminal original petition accordingly.
Criminal Original Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Fifth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6288 of 2022
S.CHANDRU
[ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, VELLORE DISTRICT. CRIME NO.3/2022
For Petitioner : M/S. M.DURAIMURUGAN Advocate
For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
-sd/-
05/04/2022
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH VELLORE DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1 CC to M/S. M.DURAIMURUGAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.5190
CRL OP.6288/2022
Date :05/04/2022
TA-08/04/2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. CHANDRU
STATE
G. JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
