Dismissed

Munusamy v. the State Rep by

Madras HC5 Apr 2022CRL OP/2398/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal original petition, the petitioner sought anticipatory bail for an alleged offence of land grabbing by forging documents under various sections of the IPC. The High Court dismissed the bail plea, noting that other accused persons were not cooperating with the investigation and considering the gravity of the offence.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition No.2398/2022 and connected Miscellaneous Petition No.4262/2022 were dismissed.

Munusamy Vs the State Rep by — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Fifth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.2398 of 2022

¶7

AND

¶8

CRL.MP.NO.4262 of 2022

¶9

MUNUSAMY [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶10

¶11

THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB-II, CHENNAI. (CR NO.109/2021)

¶12

Petitions praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to

¶13

(i)Enlarge him on bail in Crime No.109/2021 on the file of the Respondent Police at that event of arrest and pass such or other orders as this Hon`ble Court may think as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. (CRL.OP.NO.2398/2022)

¶14

(ii)Amend the section as 420,465,467,471 of Indian Penal Code and R/W Section 34 of I.P.C and include the section 468 IPC in the above CRL.OP.NO.2398/2022 and pass such or other orders. [CRL.MP.NO.4262/2022]

¶15

Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.CHRISTINA DHANARANI Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.R.P.MURUGAN RAJA,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶16

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 471 of IPC and r/w Section 34 of IPC in Crime No.109 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

2.It is reported that offence of land grabbing by forging the document is under investigation.

¶19

3.The learned Additional Government Pleader states that the accused persons are not co-operating for the investigation.

¶20

4.Considering the gravity of the offence, this Criminal Original Petition for anticipatory bail is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.

¶21

-sd/-

¶22

05/04/2022

¶23

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶24

TRUE COPY

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO

¶26

1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB-II, CHENNAI.

¶27

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

CC to M/S.K.CHRISTINA DHANARANI Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶29

CRL OP.2398/2022 AND CRL.MP.4262/2022 Date :05/04/2022

¶30

CSK 06/05/2022

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Munusamy v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munusamy v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvaraj Vs Gomathi

Jothibasu Vs the State Rep.by

R.Manibala Vs State Represented by

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Vs the State Rep.by Its

S.Chandru Vs State by the Inspector Ofpolice

Jothi Vs the State Rep.by