Disposed

Jothibasu v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC4 Apr 2022CRL MP/4260/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court ordered an extension of time for the petitioner to execute a bond and produce sureties under a prior anticipatory bail order. The petitioner was granted until April 18, 2022, with a warning that failure to comply would result in automatic cancellation of bail.

What did the court decide?

Time granted until 18.04.2022 for executing bond and sureties; automatic cancellation of bail if not complied by then.

Jothibasu Vs the State Rep.by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Fourth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.4260 of 2022

¶7

IN CRL OP.9854 of 2021

¶8

JOTHIBASU [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 ]

¶9

¶10

THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SETHIYATHOPE POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extent the time granted in Crl OP No.9854 of 2021, order dated 04.06.2021 in Crime No.284 of 2021 and pass such other further orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.D.ARUN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶13

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner to extend the time to comply with the condition made in Crl.O.P.No.9854 of 2021, dated 04.06.2021.

¶14

This Court on 04.06.2021, while granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner imposed a condition that the petitioner should execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Chidambaram, on or before 05.07.2021.

¶15

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submits that the above stated condition was not complied by the petitioner.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner states since the amendment petition filed before this Court he could not able to comply the conditions within a time stipulate by this Court.

¶18

Taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, for executing sureties time is extended till 18.04.2022, with a condition that no further extension of time will be granted failing which, the bail granted will be automatically cancelled without any reference to this Court.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

04/04/2022

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, CHIDAMBARAM, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

¶26

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CUDDALORE [FOR INFORMATION]

¶27

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SETHIYATHOPE POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

¶28

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶29

5 THE COVID-19 RELIEF FUND IN FAVOUR OF THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, CUDDALORE.

¶30

C.C. to M/S.D.ARUN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶31

Order in CRL MP.4260/2022 in CRL OP.9854/2021 Date :04/04/2022

¶32

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format JPA 11/04/2022

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Jothibasu v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jothibasu v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Karthikeyan Vs the State Rep by

Ramesh Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Dineshkumar Vs State Rep by

Selvaraj Vs Gomathi

R.Manibala Vs State Represented by

Sakthivel Vs Rukmangathan