Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh v. the State Rep.by Its
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Original Petition for anticipatory bail was withdrawn by counsel. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Fifth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6258 of 2022
1 DINESH KUMAR @ DINESH [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ]
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY ITS [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AVINASHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR.
(CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2022)
For Petitioner : M/S.J.KINGSLY SOLOMON Advocate
For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
-sd/-
05/04/2022
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AVINASHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1CC to M/S.J.KINGSLY SOLOMON Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.5370
CRL OP.6258/2022
Date :05/04/2022
CSK 08/04/2022
DINESH KUMAR @ DINESH
THE STATE
G. JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court